>>133844406>it's just that the only guy(s) that consistently criticizes Ian here is IDWkunI know, trust me when I say this isn't the first time I've participated in these threads. IDWkun surely is a study case, even in the IDW threads he comes in and... just ruins them (though anons there usually refer to him as the "archieschizo", cause... that's the only thing he talks about, even if only "bad things"), so yeah, not even people who like IDW Sonic tolerate the guy.
>>133844420>saying shit like "I would like to check how big is the damage Flynn did to the game continuity" immediately makes it clear that you aren't really here to discuss anything in good faithI can see your point. I should have used a different euphemism, instead of "let's see the damage" (which can come in too strong, I suppose) I shouldn't have something among the lines of "I would like to check how well Ian handled a videogame story", or just outright say I want to know the whole plot, no mention of the writer.
Alas, it wasn't the case, if what I said came in too strong for you, the only thing I can do is apologize for that.
And, just in case, I wasn't even asking for a discussion, not over Frontiers or even Ian, just asking if somebody had the information I needed or a lead.
>>133844448>It's just weird that given the handling of Sonic's writing in the past games and the decisions Sonic Team has made, you'd be wary of Ian.I'm wary of any decision SEGA does related to Sonic. Hey, if you trust a writer or a game designer in such lengths, kudos to you.